[CDBI] Many-to-Many - why no CDBI::Relationship?

[Ryan Tate]

On 8/23/06, Matt S Trout <dbix-class at trout.me.uk> wrote:
> You'll find there's a Big Obvious Comment in the source to by HasManyToMany
> crediting HasManyOrdered; it was basically a "derive, cleanup, dump features I
> don't need and add a couple of bits and pieces I do" job.

OK, I'll check it out! I don't need the "ordered" part at the moment ...

RT