[CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class

Tim Bunce Tim.Bunce at pobox.com
Tue Feb 28 00:15:17 GMT 2006


On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:04:41AM +0000, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:18:20AM +0000, Matt S Trout wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:59:34AM +1030, David Lloyd wrote:
> > > 
> > > DBIx::Class claims it's better than Class::DBI but I'm not sure why and
> > > haven't found a place that gives a reasonable comparison - does anyone
> > > know of one?
> > 
> > Siracusa and I worked out one for DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object -
> > 
> > http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/2005-December/003183.html
> > 
> > although it's a little out of date. Also it's probably worth looking at
> > 
> > http://www.spanner.org/lists/cdbi/2005/07/25/b9f7cc4c.html
> > 
> > which appears to be as much of an archive of the original announce thread as
> > I can easily find.
> > 
> > If nobody's going to kill me for advocacy I'd be happy to work with the
> > list on one - maybe if we aggregate them together we can sort out a joint
> > "ORM comparison guide" between the three communities or similar.
> 
> I think that would be a very good idea. The current confusion isn't
> good for anyone.

Any news?

Tim.




More information about the ClassDBI mailing list