[CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Tim.Bunce at pobox.com
Wed Jan 18 11:37:49 GMT 2006
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:21:13AM +0000, Matt S Trout wrote:
> > DBI 1.40 was released in January 2004.
> > Class::DBI and DBIx::Class (and others) should probably be passing 3
> > for the $if_active parameter. Set it and forget it.
> Still doesn't help the problem I had, which was a broken DBD. My point was
> more that customising this in Class::DBI is a complete pain (we eventually
> just shipped customers a patched Ima::DBI) whereas in DBIx::Class you can
> just subclass storage, override ->sth and get on with your life. I'm
> already aware of a DBIx::Class user making use of this ability to get
> round issues with bind parameter support in FreeTDS.
Sounds good to me.
More information about the ClassDBI