[CDBI] Re: Apps using Class::DBI
Christopher H. Laco
claco at chrislaco.com
Wed Mar 29 19:45:35 BST 2006
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:24 -0500, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>> First, there's the threading/forking issues of CDBI based projects, esp.
>> when it comes to preloading in things like Apache/ModPerl. DBIC is more
>> thread/fork friendly out of the box.
> This is partly my fault for not getting my Ima::DBI fix onto CPAN yet.
> I'll try to do something about that Real Soon.
>> Transactions. It's possible in CDBI, but it's hackish at best. DBIC is
>> built wwith then in mind, instead of as an afterthought.
> Could you give an example? I always thought of transactions as pretty
> much orthogonal to Class::DBI. What's different about them in
/me puts on Matt hat/
/me removes Matt hat/
I couldn't resist.
As for the examples:
That page makes a pretty clear case that transactions don't JustWork
Plus, fighting AutoCommit, vs. autoupdate/update, vs. Transactions is
just way to complicated...or more than it has to be I think.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.digitalcraftsmen.net/mailman/private/classdbi/attachments/20060329/62a3f6d8/signature.pgp
More information about the ClassDBI